naked / default rider 183 cm
Kawasaki ER-6n vs Kawasaki Z300 ergonomics
Kawasaki ER-6n and Kawasaki Z300 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Kawasaki ER-6n
All contacts reached
Kawasaki Z300
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Kawasaki ER-6n lists a 785 mm seat; the Kawasaki Z300 lists 785 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Kawasaki ER-6n | Kawasaki Z300 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 785 mm | 785 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,405 mm | 1,405 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 168 kg |
| Displacement | 649 cc | 296 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Kawasaki ER-6n
- Sport (61.5 deg)
- Kawasaki Z300
- Sport (61.5 deg)
Hip angle
- Kawasaki ER-6n
- Neutral (92.6 deg)
- Kawasaki Z300
- Neutral (92.6 deg)
Elbow angle
- Kawasaki ER-6n
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Kawasaki Z300
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Kawasaki ER-6n
- Neutral (12.1 deg)
- Kawasaki Z300
- Neutral (12.1 deg)