Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

enduro / default rider 183 cm

Kawasaki KDX200 vs Yamaha IT465 ergonomics

Kawasaki KDX200 and Yamaha IT465 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.

Modeled fit comparison

Kawasaki KDX200

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Yamaha IT465

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Kawasaki KDX200 lists a 919 mm seat; the Yamaha IT465 lists 917 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Kawasaki KDX200 and Yamaha IT465
SpecKawasaki KDX200Yamaha IT465
Seat height919 mm917 mm
Wheelbase1,435 mm1,450 mm
Wet weight--
Displacement198 cc465 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Kawasaki KDX200
Sport (58.0 deg)
Yamaha IT465
Sport (58.1 deg)

Hip angle

Kawasaki KDX200
Neutral (94.3 deg)
Yamaha IT465
Neutral (94.0 deg)

Elbow angle

Kawasaki KDX200
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Yamaha IT465
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Kawasaki KDX200
Neutral (11.8 deg)
Yamaha IT465
Neutral (12.0 deg)