dual-sport / default rider 183 cm
Kawasaki KLX250 vs KTM 390 Enduro R ergonomics
Kawasaki KLX250 and KTM 390 Enduro R have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Kawasaki KLX250
All contacts reached
KTM 390 Enduro R
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Kawasaki KLX250 lists a 889 mm seat; the KTM 390 Enduro R lists 889 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Kawasaki KLX250 | KTM 390 Enduro R |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 889 mm | 889 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,430 mm | 1,473 mm |
| Wet weight | 138 kg | 165 kg |
| Displacement | 249 cc | 399 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Kawasaki KLX250
- Sport (67.5 deg)
- KTM 390 Enduro R
- Sport (67.5 deg)
Hip angle
- Kawasaki KLX250
- Neutral (108.0 deg)
- KTM 390 Enduro R
- Neutral (107.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- Kawasaki KLX250
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- KTM 390 Enduro R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Kawasaki KLX250
- Neutral (6.2 deg)
- KTM 390 Enduro R
- Neutral (6.8 deg)