dual-sport / default rider 183 cm
Kawasaki KLX400SR vs KTM 640 LC4 Enduro ergonomics
Kawasaki KLX400SR and KTM 640 LC4 Enduro have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Kawasaki KLX400SR
All contacts reached
KTM 640 LC4 Enduro
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Kawasaki KLX400SR lists a 930 mm seat; the KTM 640 LC4 Enduro lists 925 mm — a 5 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
On seat height alone, the KTM 640 LC4 Enduro has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Kawasaki KLX400SR | KTM 640 LC4 Enduro |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 930 mm | 925 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,485 mm | 1,510 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 398 cc | 625 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Kawasaki KLX400SR
- Sport (67.5 deg)
- KTM 640 LC4 Enduro
- Sport (67.6 deg)
Hip angle
- Kawasaki KLX400SR
- Neutral (107.1 deg)
- KTM 640 LC4 Enduro
- Neutral (106.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Kawasaki KLX400SR
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- KTM 640 LC4 Enduro
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Kawasaki KLX400SR
- Neutral (7.0 deg)
- KTM 640 LC4 Enduro
- Neutral (7.4 deg)