sport / default rider 183 cm
Kawasaki Ninja H2 Carbon ABS vs KTM RC 390 ergonomics
Kawasaki Ninja H2 Carbon ABS and KTM RC 390 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Kawasaki Ninja H2 Carbon ABS
90Comfortable
All contacts reached
KTM RC 390
90Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Kawasaki Ninja H2 Carbon ABS has a 825 mm seat; the KTM RC 390 sits at 824 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 83 cm for the Kawasaki Ninja H2 Carbon ABS and 82 cm for the KTM RC 390.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Kawasaki Ninja H2 Carbon ABS | KTM RC 390 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 825 mm | 824 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,455 mm | 1,355 mm |
| Wet weight | 238 kg | - |
| Displacement | 998 cc | 373 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Kawasaki Ninja H2 Carbon ABS
- Sport (60.7 deg)
- KTM RC 390
- Sport (60.7 deg)
Hip angle
- Kawasaki Ninja H2 Carbon ABS
- Neutral (99.4 deg)
- KTM RC 390
- Neutral (99.6 deg)
Elbow angle
- Kawasaki Ninja H2 Carbon ABS
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- KTM RC 390
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Kawasaki Ninja H2 Carbon ABS
- Forward (25.7 deg)
- KTM RC 390
- Forward (25.2 deg)