sport-touring / default rider 183 cm
Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX vs Triumph Tiger 1050 Sport ergonomics
Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX and Triumph Tiger 1050 Sport have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX
All contacts reached
Triumph Tiger 1050 Sport
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX lists a 835 mm seat; the Triumph Tiger 1050 Sport lists 831 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX | Triumph Tiger 1050 Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 835 mm | 831 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,480 mm | 1,539 mm |
| Wet weight | 256 kg | 235 kg |
| Displacement | 998 cc | 1,050 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX
- Sport (58.0 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 1050 Sport
- Sport (58.2 deg)
Hip angle
- Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX
- Neutral (89.9 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 1050 Sport
- Neutral (88.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 1050 Sport
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX
- Neutral (13.5 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 1050 Sport
- Neutral (14.1 deg)