sport-touring / default rider 183 cm
Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX vs Triumph Tiger Sport 660 ergonomics
Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX and Triumph Tiger Sport 660 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Triumph Tiger Sport 660
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX has a 835 mm seat; the Triumph Tiger Sport 660 sits at 835 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 84 cm for the Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX and 84 cm for the Triumph Tiger Sport 660.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX | Triumph Tiger Sport 660 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 835 mm | 835 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,480 mm | 1,418 mm |
| Wet weight | 256 kg | 207 kg |
| Displacement | 998 cc | 660 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX
- Sport (58.0 deg)
- Triumph Tiger Sport 660
- Sport (57.8 deg)
Hip angle
- Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX
- Neutral (89.9 deg)
- Triumph Tiger Sport 660
- Neutral (91.2 deg)
Elbow angle
- Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Tiger Sport 660
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX
- Neutral (13.5 deg)
- Triumph Tiger Sport 660
- Neutral (12.8 deg)