sport-touring / default rider 183 cm
Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX vs Triumph Tiger Sport 800 ergonomics
Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX and Triumph Tiger Sport 800 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX
All contacts reached
Triumph Tiger Sport 800
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX lists a 835 mm seat; the Triumph Tiger Sport 800 lists 835 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX | Triumph Tiger Sport 800 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 835 mm | 835 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,480 mm | 1,422 mm |
| Wet weight | 256 kg | 214 kg |
| Displacement | 998 cc | 798 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX
- Sport (58.0 deg)
- Triumph Tiger Sport 800
- Sport (57.8 deg)
Hip angle
- Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX
- Neutral (89.9 deg)
- Triumph Tiger Sport 800
- Neutral (91.1 deg)
Elbow angle
- Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Tiger Sport 800
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Kawasaki Ninja H2 SX
- Neutral (13.5 deg)
- Triumph Tiger Sport 800
- Neutral (12.8 deg)