naked / default rider 183 cm
Kawasaki Z800 vs KTM 1390 Super Duke R Evo ergonomics
Kawasaki Z800 and KTM 1390 Super Duke R Evo have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Kawasaki Z800
All contacts reached
KTM 1390 Super Duke R Evo
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Kawasaki Z800 lists a 834 mm seat; the KTM 1390 Super Duke R Evo lists 834 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Kawasaki Z800 | KTM 1390 Super Duke R Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 834 mm | 834 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,445 mm | 1,491 mm |
| Wet weight | 229 kg | 212 kg |
| Displacement | 806 cc | 1,350 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Kawasaki Z800
- Sport (61.7 deg)
- KTM 1390 Super Duke R Evo
- Sport (72.6 deg)
Hip angle
- Kawasaki Z800
- Neutral (91.7 deg)
- KTM 1390 Super Duke R Evo
- Neutral (122.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- Kawasaki Z800
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- KTM 1390 Super Duke R Evo
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Kawasaki Z800
- Neutral (12.8 deg)
- KTM 1390 Super Duke R Evo
- Neutral (11.3 deg)