Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

cafe-racer / default rider 183 cm

Keeway Cafe Racer 152 vs Laverda 750 S Formula ergonomics

Keeway Cafe Racer 152 and Laverda 750 S Formula have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.

Modeled fit comparison

Keeway Cafe Racer 152

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Laverda 750 S Formula

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Keeway Cafe Racer 152 lists a 770 mm seat; the Laverda 750 S Formula lists 770 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Keeway Cafe Racer 152 and Laverda 750 S Formula
SpecKeeway Cafe Racer 152Laverda 750 S Formula
Seat height770 mm770 mm
Wheelbase1,245 mm1,375 mm
Wet weight108 kg210 kg
Displacement149 cc748 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Keeway Cafe Racer 152
Sport (57.6 deg)
Laverda 750 S Formula
Sport (57.9 deg)

Hip angle

Keeway Cafe Racer 152
Neutral (98.7 deg)
Laverda 750 S Formula
Neutral (95.7 deg)

Elbow angle

Keeway Cafe Racer 152
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Laverda 750 S Formula
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Keeway Cafe Racer 152
Neutral (8.9 deg)
Laverda 750 S Formula
Neutral (10.9 deg)