sport-touring / default rider 183 cm
KTM 1290 Super Duke GT vs Triumph Tiger Sport 660 ergonomics
KTM 1290 Super Duke GT and Triumph Tiger Sport 660 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
KTM 1290 Super Duke GT
All contacts reached
Triumph Tiger Sport 660
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The KTM 1290 Super Duke GT lists a 835 mm seat; the Triumph Tiger Sport 660 lists 835 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | KTM 1290 Super Duke GT | Triumph Tiger Sport 660 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 835 mm | 835 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,482 mm | 1,418 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 206 kg |
| Displacement | 1,301 cc | 660 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- KTM 1290 Super Duke GT
- Sport (58.0 deg)
- Triumph Tiger Sport 660
- Sport (57.8 deg)
Hip angle
- KTM 1290 Super Duke GT
- Neutral (89.9 deg)
- Triumph Tiger Sport 660
- Neutral (91.2 deg)
Elbow angle
- KTM 1290 Super Duke GT
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Tiger Sport 660
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- KTM 1290 Super Duke GT
- Neutral (13.5 deg)
- Triumph Tiger Sport 660
- Neutral (12.8 deg)