adventure / default rider 183 cm
KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo vs Triumph Tiger 800 ergonomics
KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo and Triumph Tiger 800 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo
All contacts reached
Triumph Tiger 800
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo lists a 847 mm seat; the Triumph Tiger 800 lists 845 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo | Triumph Tiger 800 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 847 mm | 845 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,558 mm | 1,545 mm |
| Wet weight | 245 kg | 221 kg |
| Displacement | 1,350 cc | 799 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo
- Sport (65.7 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 800
- Sport (65.6 deg)
Hip angle
- KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo
- Neutral (99.6 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 800
- Neutral (100.0 deg)
Elbow angle
- KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 800
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- KTM 1390 Super Adventure S Evo
- Neutral (10.7 deg)
- Triumph Tiger 800
- Neutral (10.5 deg)