Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

enduro / default rider 183 cm

KTM 350 EXC-F vs SWM RS 500 R ergonomics

KTM 350 EXC-F and SWM RS 500 R have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.

Modeled fit comparison

KTM 350 EXC-F

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

SWM RS 500 R

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The KTM 350 EXC-F lists a 963 mm seat; the SWM RS 500 R lists 963 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for KTM 350 EXC-F and SWM RS 500 R
SpecKTM 350 EXC-FSWM RS 500 R
Seat height963 mm963 mm
Wheelbase1,489 mm1,495 mm
Wet weight--
Displacement350 cc501 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

KTM 350 EXC-F
Sport (58.1 deg)
SWM RS 500 R
Sport (58.1 deg)

Hip angle

KTM 350 EXC-F
Neutral (93.2 deg)
SWM RS 500 R
Neutral (93.1 deg)

Elbow angle

KTM 350 EXC-F
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
SWM RS 500 R
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

KTM 350 EXC-F
Neutral (12.6 deg)
SWM RS 500 R
Neutral (12.7 deg)