dual-sport / default rider 183 cm
KTM 390 Enduro R vs Suzuki DR350 ergonomics
KTM 390 Enduro R and Suzuki DR350 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
KTM 390 Enduro R
All contacts reached
Suzuki DR350
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The KTM 390 Enduro R lists a 890 mm seat; the Suzuki DR350 lists 890 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | KTM 390 Enduro R | Suzuki DR350 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 890 mm | 890 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,475 mm | 1,440 mm |
| Wet weight | 165 kg | - |
| Displacement | 399 cc | 349 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- KTM 390 Enduro R
- Sport (67.5 deg)
- Suzuki DR350
- Sport (67.5 deg)
Hip angle
- KTM 390 Enduro R
- Neutral (107.3 deg)
- Suzuki DR350
- Neutral (107.9 deg)
Elbow angle
- KTM 390 Enduro R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki DR350
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- KTM 390 Enduro R
- Neutral (6.8 deg)
- Suzuki DR350
- Neutral (6.4 deg)