dual-sport / default rider 183 cm
KTM 640 LC4 Enduro vs Yamaha WR250R ergonomics
KTM 640 LC4 Enduro and Yamaha WR250R have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
KTM 640 LC4 Enduro
All contacts reached
Yamaha WR250R
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The KTM 640 LC4 Enduro lists a 925 mm seat; the Yamaha WR250R lists 930 mm — a 5 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
On seat height alone, the KTM 640 LC4 Enduro has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | KTM 640 LC4 Enduro | Yamaha WR250R |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 925 mm | 930 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,510 mm | 1,425 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 134 kg |
| Displacement | 625 cc | 250 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- KTM 640 LC4 Enduro
- Sport (67.6 deg)
- Yamaha WR250R
- Sport (67.5 deg)
Hip angle
- KTM 640 LC4 Enduro
- Neutral (106.5 deg)
- Yamaha WR250R
- Neutral (108.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- KTM 640 LC4 Enduro
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Yamaha WR250R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- KTM 640 LC4 Enduro
- Neutral (7.4 deg)
- Yamaha WR250R
- Neutral (6.1 deg)