dual-sport / default rider 183 cm
KTM 640 LC4 Enduro vs Yamaha WR250R ergonomics
KTM 640 LC4 Enduro and Yamaha WR250R land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
KTM 640 LC4 Enduro
All contacts reached
Yamaha WR250R
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The KTM 640 LC4 Enduro has a 925 mm seat; the Yamaha WR250R sits at 930 mm — a 5 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 93 cm for the KTM 640 LC4 Enduro and 93 cm for the Yamaha WR250R.
That makes the KTM 640 LC4 Enduro the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Yamaha WR250R gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | KTM 640 LC4 Enduro | Yamaha WR250R |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 925 mm | 930 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,510 mm | 1,420 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 134 kg |
| Displacement | 625 cc | 250 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- KTM 640 LC4 Enduro
- Sport (67.6 deg)
- Yamaha WR250R
- Sport (67.5 deg)
Hip angle
- KTM 640 LC4 Enduro
- Neutral (106.5 deg)
- Yamaha WR250R
- Neutral (108.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- KTM 640 LC4 Enduro
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Yamaha WR250R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- KTM 640 LC4 Enduro
- Neutral (7.4 deg)
- Yamaha WR250R
- Neutral (6.0 deg)