electric / default rider 183 cm
KTM Freeride E vs Stark Future VARG ergonomics
KTM Freeride E and Stark Future VARG land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
KTM Freeride E
All contacts reached
Stark Future VARG
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The KTM Freeride E has a 909 mm seat; the Stark Future VARG sits at 962 mm — a 53 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 91 cm for the KTM Freeride E and 96 cm for the Stark Future VARG.
That makes the KTM Freeride E the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Stark Future VARG gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | KTM Freeride E | Stark Future VARG |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 909 mm | 962 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,455 mm | 1,492 mm |
| Wet weight | 112 kg | 110 kg |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- KTM Freeride E
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Stark Future VARG
- Sport (58.2 deg)
Hip angle
- KTM Freeride E
- Neutral (93.9 deg)
- Stark Future VARG
- Neutral (93.0 deg)
Elbow angle
- KTM Freeride E
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Stark Future VARG
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- KTM Freeride E
- Neutral (12.1 deg)
- Stark Future VARG
- Neutral (12.7 deg)