electric / default rider 183 cm
KTM Freeride E vs Stark Future Varg SM ergonomics
KTM Freeride E and Stark Future Varg SM have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
KTM Freeride E
All contacts reached
Stark Future Varg SM
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The KTM Freeride E lists a 910 mm seat; the Stark Future Varg SM lists 935 mm — a 25 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
On seat height alone, the KTM Freeride E has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | KTM Freeride E | Stark Future Varg SM |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 910 mm | 935 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,455 mm | 1,471 mm |
| Wet weight | 112 kg | 125 kg |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- KTM Freeride E
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Stark Future Varg SM
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- KTM Freeride E
- Neutral (93.9 deg)
- Stark Future Varg SM
- Neutral (93.6 deg)
Elbow angle
- KTM Freeride E
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Stark Future Varg SM
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- KTM Freeride E
- Neutral (12.1 deg)
- Stark Future Varg SM
- Neutral (12.3 deg)