electric / default rider 183 cm
Maeving RM2 vs Super Soco TS1200R ergonomics
Maeving RM2 and Super Soco TS1200R land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Maeving RM2
All contacts reached
Super Soco TS1200R
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Maeving RM2 has a 775 mm seat; the Super Soco TS1200R sits at 770 mm — a 5 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 78 cm for the Maeving RM2 and 77 cm for the Super Soco TS1200R.
That makes the Super Soco TS1200R the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Maeving RM2 gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Maeving RM2 | Super Soco TS1200R |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 775 mm | 770 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,397 mm | 1,320 mm |
| Wet weight | 145 kg | 89 kg |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Maeving RM2
- Sport (57.9 deg)
- Super Soco TS1200R
- Sport (57.8 deg)
Hip angle
- Maeving RM2
- Neutral (95.3 deg)
- Super Soco TS1200R
- Neutral (96.9 deg)
Elbow angle
- Maeving RM2
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Super Soco TS1200R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Maeving RM2
- Neutral (11.3 deg)
- Super Soco TS1200R
- Neutral (10.1 deg)