electric / default rider 183 cm
Maeving RM2 vs Super Soco TS1200R ergonomics
Maeving RM2 and Super Soco TS1200R have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Maeving RM2
All contacts reached
Super Soco TS1200R
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Maeving RM2 lists a 775 mm seat; the Super Soco TS1200R lists 770 mm — a 5 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
On seat height alone, the Super Soco TS1200R has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Maeving RM2 | Super Soco TS1200R |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 775 mm | 770 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,397 mm | 1,320 mm |
| Wet weight | 145 kg | 89 kg |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Maeving RM2
- Sport (57.9 deg)
- Super Soco TS1200R
- Sport (57.8 deg)
Hip angle
- Maeving RM2
- Neutral (95.3 deg)
- Super Soco TS1200R
- Neutral (96.9 deg)
Elbow angle
- Maeving RM2
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Super Soco TS1200R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Maeving RM2
- Neutral (11.3 deg)
- Super Soco TS1200R
- Neutral (10.1 deg)