electric / default rider 183 cm
Maeving RM2 vs TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh ergonomics
Maeving RM2 and TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Maeving RM2
All contacts reached
TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Maeving RM2 has a 775 mm seat; the TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh sits at 770 mm — a 5 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 78 cm for the Maeving RM2 and 77 cm for the TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh.
That makes the TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Maeving RM2 gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Maeving RM2 | TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 775 mm | 770 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,397 mm | 1,301 mm |
| Wet weight | 145 kg | 132 kg |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Maeving RM2
- Sport (57.9 deg)
- TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh
- Sport (57.7 deg)
Hip angle
- Maeving RM2
- Neutral (95.3 deg)
- TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh
- Neutral (97.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- Maeving RM2
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Maeving RM2
- Neutral (11.3 deg)
- TVS Motor iQube ST 5.3 kWh
- Neutral (9.8 deg)