cruiser / default rider 183 cm
Moto Guzzi Audace vs Royal Enfield Super Meteor 650 ergonomics
Moto Guzzi Audace and Royal Enfield Super Meteor 650 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Moto Guzzi Audace
92Comfortable
All contacts reached
Royal Enfield Super Meteor 650
92Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Moto Guzzi Audace has a 740 mm seat; the Royal Enfield Super Meteor 650 sits at 740 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 74 cm for the Moto Guzzi Audace and 74 cm for the Royal Enfield Super Meteor 650.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Moto Guzzi Audace | Royal Enfield Super Meteor 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 740 mm | 740 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,685 mm | 1,500 mm |
| Wet weight | 299 kg | 241 kg |
| Displacement | 1,380 cc | 648 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Moto Guzzi Audace
- Open (124.0 deg)
- Royal Enfield Super Meteor 650
- Open (108.3 deg)
Hip angle
- Moto Guzzi Audace
- Sport (80.6 deg)
- Royal Enfield Super Meteor 650
- Sport (78.4 deg)
Elbow angle
- Moto Guzzi Audace
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Royal Enfield Super Meteor 650
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Moto Guzzi Audace
- Neutral (10.7 deg)
- Royal Enfield Super Meteor 650
- Neutral (7.9 deg)