cafe-racer / default rider 183 cm
Mutt Motorcycles Mongrel 125 vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 ergonomics
Mutt Motorcycles Mongrel 125 and Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Mutt Motorcycles Mongrel 125
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Mutt Motorcycles Mongrel 125 | Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 790 mm | 790 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,295 mm | 1,398 mm |
| Wet weight | 135 kg | - |
| Displacement | 125 cc | 648 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Mutt Motorcycles Mongrel 125
- Sport (57.7 deg)
- Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
- Sport (58.0 deg)
Hip angle
- Mutt Motorcycles Mongrel 125
- Neutral (97.5 deg)
- Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
- Neutral (95.1 deg)
Elbow angle
- Mutt Motorcycles Mongrel 125
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Mutt Motorcycles Mongrel 125
- Neutral (9.7 deg)
- Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
- Neutral (11.3 deg)