naked / default rider 183 cm
MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR vs Suzuki B-King ergonomics
MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR and Suzuki B-King land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Suzuki B-King
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR has a 805 mm seat; the Suzuki B-King sits at 805 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 81 cm for the MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR and 81 cm for the Suzuki B-King.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR | Suzuki B-King |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 805 mm | 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,410 mm | 1,524 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 255 kg |
| Displacement | 1,078 cc | 1,340 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
- Sport (61.6 deg)
- Suzuki B-King
- Sport (62.0 deg)
Hip angle
- MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
- Neutral (92.4 deg)
- Suzuki B-King
- Neutral (89.6 deg)
Elbow angle
- MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki B-King
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
- Neutral (12.3 deg)
- Suzuki B-King
- Neutral (14.1 deg)