naked / default rider 183 cm
MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR vs Triumph Tracker 400 ergonomics
MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR and Triumph Tracker 400 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Triumph Tracker 400
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR has a 805 mm seat; the Triumph Tracker 400 sits at 805 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 81 cm for the MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR and 81 cm for the Triumph Tracker 400.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR | Triumph Tracker 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 805 mm | 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,410 mm | 1,371 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 173 kg |
| Displacement | 1,078 cc | 398 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
- Sport (61.6 deg)
- Triumph Tracker 400
- Sport (61.4 deg)
Hip angle
- MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
- Neutral (92.4 deg)
- Triumph Tracker 400
- Neutral (93.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Tracker 400
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
- Neutral (12.3 deg)
- Triumph Tracker 400
- Neutral (11.6 deg)