naked / default rider 183 cm
MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR vs Triumph Trident 660 ergonomics
MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR and Triumph Trident 660 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Triumph Trident 660
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR has a 805 mm seat; the Triumph Trident 660 sits at 805 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 81 cm for the MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR and 81 cm for the Triumph Trident 660.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR | Triumph Trident 660 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 805 mm | 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,410 mm | 1,401 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 190 kg |
| Displacement | 1,078 cc | 660 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
- Sport (61.6 deg)
- Triumph Trident 660
- Sport (61.5 deg)
Hip angle
- MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
- Neutral (92.4 deg)
- Triumph Trident 660
- Neutral (92.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Trident 660
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- MV Agusta Brutale 1090 RR
- Neutral (12.3 deg)
- Triumph Trident 660
- Neutral (11.9 deg)