Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

scooter / default rider 183 cm

Piaggio XEvo 400 vs Vespa GTS 310 SuperSport ergonomics

Piaggio XEvo 400 and Vespa GTS 310 SuperSport have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.

Modeled fit comparison

Piaggio XEvo 400

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Vespa GTS 310 SuperSport

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Piaggio XEvo 400 lists a 790 mm seat; the Vespa GTS 310 SuperSport lists 790 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Piaggio XEvo 400 and Vespa GTS 310 SuperSport
SpecPiaggio XEvo 400Vespa GTS 310 SuperSport
Seat height790 mm790 mm
Wheelbase1,540 mm1,339 mm
Wet weight-157 kg
Displacement399 cc310 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Piaggio XEvo 400
Sport (58.3 deg)
Vespa GTS 310 SuperSport
Sport (57.8 deg)

Hip angle

Piaggio XEvo 400
Neutral (92.1 deg)
Vespa GTS 310 SuperSport
Neutral (96.5 deg)

Elbow angle

Piaggio XEvo 400
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Vespa GTS 310 SuperSport
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Piaggio XEvo 400
Neutral (13.3 deg)
Vespa GTS 310 SuperSport
Neutral (10.4 deg)