dual-sport / default rider 183 cm
Royal Enfield Himalayan vs Suzuki TS250 ergonomics
Suzuki TS250 scores 95 vs 91 for the default rider, making it the stronger ergonomic fit than Royal Enfield Himalayan in this comparison.
Fit verdict
Royal Enfield Himalayan
91Comfortable
All contacts reached
Suzuki TS250
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Suzuki TS250 has the stronger default-rider fit in this generated comparison.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Royal Enfield Himalayan | Suzuki TS250 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 825 mm | 820 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,510 mm | 1,370 mm |
| Wet weight | 196 kg | - |
| Displacement | 452 cc | 246 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Royal Enfield Himalayan
- Sport (71.6 deg)
- Suzuki TS250
- Sport (67.4 deg)
Hip angle
- Royal Enfield Himalayan
- Open (132.4 deg)
- Suzuki TS250
- Neutral (109.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- Royal Enfield Himalayan
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki TS250
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Royal Enfield Himalayan
- Neutral (10.0 deg)
- Suzuki TS250
- Neutral (5.3 deg)