Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

electric / default rider 183 cm

Stark Future VARG vs Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP ergonomics

Stark Future VARG and Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.

Fit verdict

Stark Future VARG

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Stark Future VARG has a 962 mm seat; the Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP sits at 910 mm — a 52 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 96 cm for the Stark Future VARG and 91 cm for the Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP.

That makes the Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Stark Future VARG gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Stark Future VARG and Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP
SpecStark Future VARGSur-Ron Ultra Bee HP
Seat height962 mm910 mm
Wheelbase1,492 mm1,380 mm
Wet weight110 kg89 kg
Displacement--

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Stark Future VARG
Sport (58.2 deg)
Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP
Sport (57.9 deg)

Hip angle

Stark Future VARG
Neutral (93.0 deg)
Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP
Neutral (95.5 deg)

Elbow angle

Stark Future VARG
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Stark Future VARG
Neutral (12.7 deg)
Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP
Neutral (11.0 deg)