electric / default rider 183 cm
Stark Future Varg SM vs Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP ergonomics
Stark Future Varg SM and Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Stark Future Varg SM
All contacts reached
Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Stark Future Varg SM has a 935 mm seat; the Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP sits at 910 mm — a 25 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 94 cm for the Stark Future Varg SM and 91 cm for the Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP.
That makes the Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Stark Future Varg SM gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Stark Future Varg SM | Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 935 mm | 910 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,471 mm | 1,380 mm |
| Wet weight | 125 kg | 89 kg |
| Displacement | - | - |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Stark Future Varg SM
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP
- Sport (57.9 deg)
Hip angle
- Stark Future Varg SM
- Neutral (93.6 deg)
- Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP
- Neutral (95.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Stark Future Varg SM
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Stark Future Varg SM
- Neutral (12.3 deg)
- Sur-Ron Ultra Bee HP
- Neutral (11.0 deg)