scooter / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki Address 110 vs Suzuki Burgman 400 ergonomics
Suzuki Address 110 and Suzuki Burgman 400 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Suzuki Address 110
All contacts reached
Suzuki Burgman 400
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki Address 110 lists a 755 mm seat; the Suzuki Burgman 400 lists 755 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki Address 110 | Suzuki Burgman 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 755 mm | 755 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,260 mm | 1,580 mm |
| Wet weight | 97 kg | 218 kg |
| Displacement | 113 cc | 400 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki Address 110
- Sport (57.7 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Sport (58.4 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki Address 110
- Neutral (98.1 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Neutral (91.1 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki Address 110
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki Address 110
- Neutral (9.2 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Neutral (13.9 deg)