scooter / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki Address 110 vs Suzuki Burgman 400 ergonomics
Suzuki Address 110 and Suzuki Burgman 400 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Suzuki Address 110
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Suzuki Burgman 400
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki Address 110 has a 755 mm seat; the Suzuki Burgman 400 sits at 755 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 76 cm for the Suzuki Address 110 and 76 cm for the Suzuki Burgman 400.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki Address 110 | Suzuki Burgman 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 755 mm | 755 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,260 mm | 1,580 mm |
| Wet weight | 97 kg | 218 kg |
| Displacement | 113 cc | 400 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki Address 110
- Sport (57.7 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Sport (58.4 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki Address 110
- Neutral (98.1 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Neutral (91.1 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki Address 110
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki Address 110
- Neutral (9.2 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Neutral (13.9 deg)