scooter / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki AN 200 Burgman vs Suzuki Burgman 125 ergonomics
Suzuki AN 200 Burgman and Suzuki Burgman 125 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
All contacts reached
Suzuki Burgman 125
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki AN 200 Burgman lists a 735 mm seat; the Suzuki Burgman 125 lists 734 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki AN 200 Burgman | Suzuki Burgman 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 735 mm | 734 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,465 mm | 1,466 mm |
| Wet weight | 160 kg | 148 kg |
| Displacement | 200 cc | 125 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 125
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
- Neutral (93.8 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 125
- Neutral (93.6 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 125
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
- Neutral (12.2 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 125
- Neutral (12.3 deg)