scooter / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki AN 200 Burgman vs Suzuki Burgman 125 ergonomics
Suzuki AN 200 Burgman and Suzuki Burgman 125 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Suzuki Burgman 125
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki AN 200 Burgman has a 735 mm seat; the Suzuki Burgman 125 sits at 734 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 74 cm for the Suzuki AN 200 Burgman and 73 cm for the Suzuki Burgman 125.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki AN 200 Burgman | Suzuki Burgman 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 735 mm | 734 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,465 mm | 1,466 mm |
| Wet weight | 160 kg | 148 kg |
| Displacement | 200 cc | 125 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 125
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
- Neutral (93.8 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 125
- Neutral (93.6 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 125
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
- Neutral (12.2 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 125
- Neutral (12.3 deg)