scooter / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki AN 200 Burgman vs Suzuki Burgman 200 ergonomics
Suzuki AN 200 Burgman and Suzuki Burgman 200 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
All contacts reached
Suzuki Burgman 200
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki AN 200 Burgman lists a 735 mm seat; the Suzuki Burgman 200 lists 735 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki AN 200 Burgman | Suzuki Burgman 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 735 mm | 735 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,465 mm | 1,465 mm |
| Wet weight | 160 kg | 164 kg |
| Displacement | 200 cc | 200 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 200
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
- Neutral (93.8 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 200
- Neutral (93.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 200
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki AN 200 Burgman
- Neutral (12.2 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 200
- Neutral (12.2 deg)