scooter / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki AN 400 Burgman vs Suzuki Burgman 400 ergonomics
Suzuki AN 400 Burgman and Suzuki Burgman 400 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Posture overlay
The default rider's modeled seated posture on each bike, solved from the same geometry as the score panels and overlaid on one ground line so seat height and reach differences are visible at a glance.
Modeled fit comparison
Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
All contacts reached
Suzuki Burgman 400
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki AN 400 Burgman lists a 695 mm seat; the Suzuki Burgman 400 lists 711 mm — a 16 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
On seat height alone, the Suzuki AN 400 Burgman has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki AN 400 Burgman | Suzuki Burgman 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 695 mm | 711 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,590 mm | 1,585 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 385 cc | 400 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
- Sport (58.4 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Sport (58.4 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
- Neutral (91.0 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Neutral (91.1 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
- Neutral (14.0 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Neutral (14.0 deg)
Fit by rider height
Modeled ground contact by rider height, in 5 bands from 5'2" to 6'4" (158-193 cm).
| Rider height | Suzuki AN 400 Burgman | Suzuki Burgman 400 |
|---|---|---|
| 158 cm / 5'2" | Both feet flat | Both feet flat |
| 167 cm / 5'6" | Both feet flat | Both feet flat |
| 176 cm / 5'9" | Both feet flat | Both feet flat |
| 184 cm / 6'0" | Both feet flat | Both feet flat |
| 193 cm / 6'4" | Both feet flat | Both feet flat |
Modeled from each bike's seat height and a typical inseam-to-height ratio only — not a flat-footing guarantee. Real ground contact still depends on seat shape, suspension sag, footwear, and your own proportions. Confirm on the motorcycle.
Verdict
Suzuki AN 400 Burgman and Suzuki Burgman 400 are both scooter bikes, so the practical question is which of their real differences you'd actually feel. The seat height gap is the biggest single difference: Suzuki AN 400 Burgman sits 16 mm lower than Suzuki Burgman 400, which usually means an easier reach to the ground for shorter riders. None of that adds up to a clear overall winner in the modeled posture score, so the individual differences above are the more useful comparison than the headline number. Treat every figure here as a planning estimate: seat width, suspension sag, footwear, and your own proportions can shift the real feel more than a few millimetres or degrees on paper. Load your height and inseam into the simulator, then sit on both before you decide.
Kit out either bike
Related comparisons
- Aprilia Sportcity 250 vs Piaggio Beverly 400 ergonomics
- Aprilia SR GT 125 vs Aprilia SR GT 200 ergonomics
- Aprilia SR GT 125 vs Honda SH125i ergonomics
- Aprilia SR GT 200 vs Honda SH150i ergonomics
- Aprilia SR GT 200 vs Honda SH150i ergonomics
- BMW C 400 GT vs Zontes 368G ergonomics