Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

scooter / default rider 183 cm

Suzuki AN 400 Burgman vs Suzuki Burgman 400 ergonomics

Suzuki AN 400 Burgman and Suzuki Burgman 400 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.

Fit verdict

Suzuki AN 400 Burgman

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Suzuki Burgman 400

95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Suzuki AN 400 Burgman has a 695 mm seat; the Suzuki Burgman 400 sits at 711 mm — a 16 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 70 cm for the Suzuki AN 400 Burgman and 71 cm for the Suzuki Burgman 400.

That makes the Suzuki AN 400 Burgman the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Suzuki Burgman 400 gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Suzuki AN 400 Burgman and Suzuki Burgman 400
SpecSuzuki AN 400 BurgmanSuzuki Burgman 400
Seat height695 mm711 mm
Wheelbase1,590 mm1,585 mm
Wet weight--
Displacement385 cc400 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
Sport (58.4 deg)
Suzuki Burgman 400
Sport (58.4 deg)

Hip angle

Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
Neutral (91.0 deg)
Suzuki Burgman 400
Neutral (91.1 deg)

Elbow angle

Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Suzuki Burgman 400
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
Neutral (14.0 deg)
Suzuki Burgman 400
Neutral (14.0 deg)