scooter / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki AN 400 Burgman vs Suzuki Burgman 400 ergonomics
Suzuki AN 400 Burgman and Suzuki Burgman 400 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
All contacts reached
Suzuki Burgman 400
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki AN 400 Burgman has a 695 mm seat; the Suzuki Burgman 400 sits at 711 mm — a 16 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 70 cm for the Suzuki AN 400 Burgman and 71 cm for the Suzuki Burgman 400.
That makes the Suzuki AN 400 Burgman the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Suzuki Burgman 400 gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki AN 400 Burgman | Suzuki Burgman 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 695 mm | 711 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,590 mm | 1,585 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 385 cc | 400 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
- Sport (58.4 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Sport (58.4 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
- Neutral (91.0 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Neutral (91.1 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
- Neutral (14.0 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Neutral (14.0 deg)