scooter / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki AN 400 Burgman vs Suzuki Burgman 400 ergonomics
Suzuki AN 400 Burgman and Suzuki Burgman 400 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
All contacts reached
Suzuki Burgman 400
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki AN 400 Burgman lists a 695 mm seat; the Suzuki Burgman 400 lists 711 mm — a 16 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
On seat height alone, the Suzuki AN 400 Burgman has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki AN 400 Burgman | Suzuki Burgman 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 695 mm | 711 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,590 mm | 1,585 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 385 cc | 400 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
- Sport (58.4 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Sport (58.4 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
- Neutral (91.0 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Neutral (91.1 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
- Neutral (14.0 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Neutral (14.0 deg)