scooter / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki AN 400 Burgman vs Yamaha Jog CE50 ergonomics
Suzuki AN 400 Burgman and Yamaha Jog CE50 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
All contacts reached
Yamaha Jog CE50
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki AN 400 Burgman lists a 695 mm seat; the Yamaha Jog CE50 lists 690 mm — a 5 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
On seat height alone, the Yamaha Jog CE50 has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki AN 400 Burgman | Yamaha Jog CE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 695 mm | 690 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,590 mm | 1,085 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 385 cc | 49 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
- Sport (58.4 deg)
- Yamaha Jog CE50
- Sport (57.3 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
- Neutral (91.0 deg)
- Yamaha Jog CE50
- Neutral (102.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Yamaha Jog CE50
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki AN 400 Burgman
- Neutral (14.0 deg)
- Yamaha Jog CE50
- Neutral (6.4 deg)