naked / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki B-King vs Triumph Tracker 400 ergonomics
Suzuki B-King and Triumph Tracker 400 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Suzuki B-King
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Triumph Tracker 400
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki B-King has a 805 mm seat; the Triumph Tracker 400 sits at 805 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 81 cm for the Suzuki B-King and 81 cm for the Triumph Tracker 400.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki B-King | Triumph Tracker 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 805 mm | 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,524 mm | 1,371 mm |
| Wet weight | 255 kg | 173 kg |
| Displacement | 1,340 cc | 398 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki B-King
- Sport (62.0 deg)
- Triumph Tracker 400
- Sport (61.4 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki B-King
- Neutral (89.6 deg)
- Triumph Tracker 400
- Neutral (93.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki B-King
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Tracker 400
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki B-King
- Neutral (14.1 deg)
- Triumph Tracker 400
- Neutral (11.6 deg)