naked / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki B-King vs Triumph Tracker 400 ergonomics
Suzuki B-King and Triumph Tracker 400 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Suzuki B-King
All contacts reached
Triumph Tracker 400
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki B-King lists a 805 mm seat; the Triumph Tracker 400 lists 805 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki B-King | Triumph Tracker 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 805 mm | 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,524 mm | 1,371 mm |
| Wet weight | 255 kg | 173 kg |
| Displacement | 1,340 cc | 398 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki B-King
- Sport (62.0 deg)
- Triumph Tracker 400
- Sport (61.4 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki B-King
- Neutral (89.6 deg)
- Triumph Tracker 400
- Neutral (93.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki B-King
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Tracker 400
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki B-King
- Neutral (14.1 deg)
- Triumph Tracker 400
- Neutral (11.6 deg)