cruiser / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki Boulevard C109R vs Triumph Bonneville Speedmaster ergonomics
Triumph Bonneville Speedmaster scores 92 vs 72 for the default rider, making it the stronger ergonomic fit than Suzuki Boulevard C109R in this comparison.
Fit verdict
Suzuki Boulevard C109R
72Usable
All contacts reached
Triumph Bonneville Speedmaster
92Comfortable
All contacts reached
Triumph Bonneville Speedmaster has the stronger default-rider fit in this generated comparison.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki Boulevard C109R has a 706 mm seat; the Triumph Bonneville Speedmaster sits at 705 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 71 cm for the Suzuki Boulevard C109R and 71 cm for the Triumph Bonneville Speedmaster.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki Boulevard C109R | Triumph Bonneville Speedmaster |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 706 mm | 705 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,755 mm | 1,510 mm |
| Wet weight | 380 kg | 263 kg |
| Displacement | 1,783 cc | 1,200 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki Boulevard C109R
- Stretched (131.6 deg)
- Triumph Bonneville Speedmaster
- Open (109.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki Boulevard C109R
- Sport (82.4 deg)
- Triumph Bonneville Speedmaster
- Sport (78.5 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki Boulevard C109R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Bonneville Speedmaster
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki Boulevard C109R
- Neutral (11.8 deg)
- Triumph Bonneville Speedmaster
- Neutral (8.1 deg)