scooter / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki Burgman 125 vs Suzuki Burgman 200 ergonomics
Suzuki Burgman 125 and Suzuki Burgman 200 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Suzuki Burgman 125
All contacts reached
Suzuki Burgman 200
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki Burgman 125 lists a 734 mm seat; the Suzuki Burgman 200 lists 735 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki Burgman 125 | Suzuki Burgman 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 734 mm | 735 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,466 mm | 1,465 mm |
| Wet weight | 148 kg | 164 kg |
| Displacement | 125 cc | 200 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki Burgman 125
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 200
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki Burgman 125
- Neutral (93.6 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 200
- Neutral (93.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki Burgman 125
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 200
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki Burgman 125
- Neutral (12.3 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 200
- Neutral (12.2 deg)