scooter / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki Burgman 125 vs Suzuki Burgman 200 ergonomics
Suzuki Burgman 125 and Suzuki Burgman 200 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Suzuki Burgman 125
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Suzuki Burgman 200
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki Burgman 125 has a 734 mm seat; the Suzuki Burgman 200 sits at 735 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 73 cm for the Suzuki Burgman 125 and 74 cm for the Suzuki Burgman 200.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki Burgman 125 | Suzuki Burgman 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 734 mm | 735 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,466 mm | 1,465 mm |
| Wet weight | 148 kg | 164 kg |
| Displacement | 125 cc | 200 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki Burgman 125
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 200
- Sport (58.1 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki Burgman 125
- Neutral (93.6 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 200
- Neutral (93.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki Burgman 125
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 200
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki Burgman 125
- Neutral (12.3 deg)
- Suzuki Burgman 200
- Neutral (12.2 deg)