scooter / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki Burgman 400 vs Yamaha Jog CE50 ergonomics
Suzuki Burgman 400 and Yamaha Jog CE50 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Suzuki Burgman 400
All contacts reached
Yamaha Jog CE50
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki Burgman 400 lists a 711 mm seat; the Yamaha Jog CE50 lists 690 mm — a 21 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
On seat height alone, the Yamaha Jog CE50 has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki Burgman 400 | Yamaha Jog CE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 711 mm | 690 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,585 mm | 1,085 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 400 cc | 49 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Sport (58.4 deg)
- Yamaha Jog CE50
- Sport (57.3 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Neutral (91.1 deg)
- Yamaha Jog CE50
- Neutral (102.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Yamaha Jog CE50
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Neutral (14.0 deg)
- Yamaha Jog CE50
- Neutral (6.4 deg)