scooter / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki Burgman 400 vs Yamaha Jog CE50 ergonomics
Suzuki Burgman 400 and Yamaha Jog CE50 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Suzuki Burgman 400
All contacts reached
Yamaha Jog CE50
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki Burgman 400 has a 711 mm seat; the Yamaha Jog CE50 sits at 690 mm — a 21 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 71 cm for the Suzuki Burgman 400 and 69 cm for the Yamaha Jog CE50.
That makes the Yamaha Jog CE50 the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the Suzuki Burgman 400 gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki Burgman 400 | Yamaha Jog CE50 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 711 mm | 690 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,585 mm | 1,085 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 400 cc | 49 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Sport (58.4 deg)
- Yamaha Jog CE50
- Sport (57.3 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Neutral (91.1 deg)
- Yamaha Jog CE50
- Neutral (102.3 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Yamaha Jog CE50
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Neutral (14.0 deg)
- Yamaha Jog CE50
- Neutral (6.4 deg)