scooter / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki Burgman 400 vs TVS Motor Zest 110 ergonomics
Suzuki Burgman 400 and TVS Motor Zest 110 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Suzuki Burgman 400
All contacts reached
TVS Motor Zest 110
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki Burgman 400 has a 755 mm seat; the TVS Motor Zest 110 sits at 760 mm — a 5 mm difference. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 76 cm for the Suzuki Burgman 400 and 76 cm for the TVS Motor Zest 110.
That makes the Suzuki Burgman 400 the easier reach to the ground — the safer pick for shorter riders or anyone who wants both feet planted at a stop — while the TVS Motor Zest 110 gives taller riders more legroom and a more open knee bend. Load your own height and inseam into the simulator to see exactly how each one fits you.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki Burgman 400 | TVS Motor Zest 110 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 755 mm | 760 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,580 mm | 1,250 mm |
| Wet weight | 218 kg | 102 kg |
| Displacement | 400 cc | 110 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Sport (58.4 deg)
- TVS Motor Zest 110
- Sport (57.6 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Neutral (91.1 deg)
- TVS Motor Zest 110
- Neutral (98.4 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- TVS Motor Zest 110
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki Burgman 400
- Neutral (13.9 deg)
- TVS Motor Zest 110
- Neutral (9.1 deg)