scooter / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki Burgman 650 vs SYM MAXSYM400i ergonomics
Suzuki Burgman 650 and SYM MAXSYM400i have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Suzuki Burgman 650
All contacts reached
SYM MAXSYM400i
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki Burgman 650 lists a 749 mm seat; the SYM MAXSYM400i lists 754 mm — a 5 mm difference. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
On seat height alone, the Suzuki Burgman 650 has the easier modeled ground reach. Load your measurements into the simulator to compare the model, then verify both motorcycles in person.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki Burgman 650 | SYM MAXSYM400i |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 749 mm | 754 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,595 mm | 1,554 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 229 kg |
| Displacement | 638 cc | 399 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki Burgman 650
- Sport (58.4 deg)
- SYM MAXSYM400i
- Sport (58.3 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki Burgman 650
- Neutral (91.0 deg)
- SYM MAXSYM400i
- Neutral (91.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki Burgman 650
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- SYM MAXSYM400i
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki Burgman 650
- Neutral (14.1 deg)
- SYM MAXSYM400i
- Neutral (13.5 deg)