standard / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki GSX-8T vs Yamaha XSR900 ergonomics
Yamaha XSR900 has the higher modeled posture score (100 vs 95) for the 183 cm default rider compared with Suzuki GSX-8T. Treat this as a planning estimate, not a comfort or purchase verdict; compare the source confidence and confirm both bikes in person.
Modeled fit comparison
Suzuki GSX-8T
All contacts reached
Yamaha XSR900
All contacts reached
Yamaha XSR900 scores higher for the 183 cm default rider in this model. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki GSX-8T lists a 815 mm seat; the Yamaha XSR900 lists 815 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki GSX-8T | Yamaha XSR900 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 815 mm | 815 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,465 mm | 1,495 mm |
| Wet weight | 201 kg | 196 kg |
| Displacement | 776 cc | 890 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki GSX-8T
- Sport (58.1 deg)
- Yamaha XSR900
- Neutral (76.6 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki GSX-8T
- Neutral (93.8 deg)
- Yamaha XSR900
- Neutral (115.7 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki GSX-8T
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Yamaha XSR900
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki GSX-8T
- Neutral (12.2 deg)
- Yamaha XSR900
- Neutral (18.3 deg)