sport-touring / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki RF900R vs Triumph Sprint ST 1050 ergonomics
Suzuki RF900R and Triumph Sprint ST 1050 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Suzuki RF900R
All contacts reached
Triumph Sprint ST 1050
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki RF900R lists a 805 mm seat; the Triumph Sprint ST 1050 lists 805 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki RF900R | Triumph Sprint ST 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 805 mm | 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,440 mm | 1,457 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 937 cc | 1,050 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki RF900R
- Sport (57.8 deg)
- Triumph Sprint ST 1050
- Sport (57.9 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki RF900R
- Neutral (90.8 deg)
- Triumph Sprint ST 1050
- Neutral (90.4 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki RF900R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Sprint ST 1050
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki RF900R
- Neutral (13.0 deg)
- Triumph Sprint ST 1050
- Neutral (13.2 deg)