sport-touring / default rider 183 cm
Suzuki RF900R vs Yamaha FJR1300ES ergonomics
Yamaha FJR1300ES has the higher modeled posture score (100 vs 95) for the 183 cm default rider compared with Suzuki RF900R. Treat this as a planning estimate, not a comfort or purchase verdict; compare the source confidence and confirm both bikes in person.
Modeled fit comparison
Suzuki RF900R
All contacts reached
Yamaha FJR1300ES
All contacts reached
Yamaha FJR1300ES scores higher for the 183 cm default rider in this model. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Suzuki RF900R lists a 805 mm seat; the Yamaha FJR1300ES lists 805 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Suzuki RF900R | Yamaha FJR1300ES |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 805 mm | 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,440 mm | 1,545 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 291 kg |
| Displacement | 937 cc | 1,298 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Suzuki RF900R
- Sport (57.8 deg)
- Yamaha FJR1300ES
- Neutral (79.6 deg)
Hip angle
- Suzuki RF900R
- Neutral (90.8 deg)
- Yamaha FJR1300ES
- Neutral (108.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- Suzuki RF900R
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Yamaha FJR1300ES
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Suzuki RF900R
- Neutral (13.0 deg)
- Yamaha FJR1300ES
- Neutral (16.2 deg)