cafe-racer / default rider 183 cm
SWM Gran Milano 440 vs Triumph Thruxton 1200 ergonomics
SWM Gran Milano 440 and Triumph Thruxton 1200 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
SWM Gran Milano 440
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Triumph Thruxton 1200
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | SWM Gran Milano 440 | Triumph Thruxton 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 809 mm | 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,410 mm | 1,415 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 224 kg |
| Displacement | 445 cc | 1,200 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- SWM Gran Milano 440
- Sport (58.0 deg)
- Triumph Thruxton 1200
- Sport (58.0 deg)
Hip angle
- SWM Gran Milano 440
- Neutral (94.8 deg)
- Triumph Thruxton 1200
- Neutral (94.9 deg)
Elbow angle
- SWM Gran Milano 440
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Thruxton 1200
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- SWM Gran Milano 440
- Neutral (11.5 deg)
- Triumph Thruxton 1200
- Neutral (11.5 deg)