standard / default rider 183 cm
Triumph Speed Twin 1200 vs Yamaha XSR900 ergonomics
Yamaha XSR900 scores 100 vs 95 for the default rider, making it the stronger ergonomic fit than Triumph Speed Twin 1200 in this comparison.
Fit verdict
Triumph Speed Twin 1200
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Yamaha XSR900
100Comfortable
All contacts reached
Yamaha XSR900 has the stronger default-rider fit in this generated comparison.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Triumph Speed Twin 1200 has a 810 mm seat; the Yamaha XSR900 sits at 810 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 81 cm for the Triumph Speed Twin 1200 and 81 cm for the Yamaha XSR900.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Triumph Speed Twin 1200 | Yamaha XSR900 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 810 mm | 810 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,413 mm | 1,495 mm |
| Wet weight | 216 kg | 193 kg |
| Displacement | 1,200 cc | 890 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Triumph Speed Twin 1200
- Sport (58.0 deg)
- Yamaha XSR900
- Neutral (75.7 deg)
Hip angle
- Triumph Speed Twin 1200
- Neutral (94.9 deg)
- Yamaha XSR900
- Neutral (115.7 deg)
Elbow angle
- Triumph Speed Twin 1200
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Yamaha XSR900
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Triumph Speed Twin 1200
- Neutral (11.5 deg)
- Yamaha XSR900
- Neutral (17.9 deg)