Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

standard / default rider 183 cm

Triumph Speed Twin 1200 vs Yamaha XSR900 ergonomics

Triumph Speed Twin 1200 and Yamaha XSR900 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.

Modeled fit comparison

Triumph Speed Twin 1200

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Yamaha XSR900

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Triumph Speed Twin 1200 lists a 810 mm seat; the Yamaha XSR900 lists 810 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Triumph Speed Twin 1200 and Yamaha XSR900
SpecTriumph Speed Twin 1200Yamaha XSR900
Seat height810 mm810 mm
Wheelbase1,413 mm1,495 mm
Wet weight216 kg193 kg
Displacement1,200 cc890 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Triumph Speed Twin 1200
Sport (58.0 deg)
Yamaha XSR900
Sport (58.1 deg)

Hip angle

Triumph Speed Twin 1200
Neutral (94.9 deg)
Yamaha XSR900
Neutral (93.1 deg)

Elbow angle

Triumph Speed Twin 1200
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Yamaha XSR900
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Triumph Speed Twin 1200
Neutral (11.5 deg)
Yamaha XSR900
Neutral (12.7 deg)