sport-touring / default rider 183 cm
Triumph Sprint RS vs Triumph Sprint ST 1050 ergonomics
Triumph Sprint RS and Triumph Sprint ST 1050 land within a few ergonomic points for the default rider, so the better choice comes down to posture preference and bike category.
Fit verdict
Triumph Sprint RS
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Triumph Sprint ST 1050
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
The two bikes are close enough that posture preference matters more than the overall score.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Triumph Sprint RS has a 805 mm seat; the Triumph Sprint ST 1050 sits at 805 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 81 cm for the Triumph Sprint RS and 81 cm for the Triumph Sprint ST 1050.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Triumph Sprint RS | Triumph Sprint ST 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 805 mm | 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,470 mm | 1,457 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 955 cc | 1,050 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Triumph Sprint RS
- Sport (57.9 deg)
- Triumph Sprint ST 1050
- Sport (57.9 deg)
Hip angle
- Triumph Sprint RS
- Neutral (90.1 deg)
- Triumph Sprint ST 1050
- Neutral (90.4 deg)
Elbow angle
- Triumph Sprint RS
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Sprint ST 1050
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Triumph Sprint RS
- Neutral (13.3 deg)
- Triumph Sprint ST 1050
- Neutral (13.2 deg)