sport-touring / default rider 183 cm
Triumph Sprint RS vs Triumph Sprint ST 1050 ergonomics
Triumph Sprint RS and Triumph Sprint ST 1050 have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.
Modeled fit comparison
Triumph Sprint RS
All contacts reached
Triumph Sprint ST 1050
All contacts reached
The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Triumph Sprint RS lists a 805 mm seat; the Triumph Sprint ST 1050 lists 805 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Triumph Sprint RS | Triumph Sprint ST 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 805 mm | 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,470 mm | 1,457 mm |
| Wet weight | - | - |
| Displacement | 955 cc | 1,050 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Triumph Sprint RS
- Sport (57.9 deg)
- Triumph Sprint ST 1050
- Sport (57.9 deg)
Hip angle
- Triumph Sprint RS
- Neutral (90.1 deg)
- Triumph Sprint ST 1050
- Neutral (90.4 deg)
Elbow angle
- Triumph Sprint RS
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Triumph Sprint ST 1050
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Triumph Sprint RS
- Neutral (13.3 deg)
- Triumph Sprint ST 1050
- Neutral (13.2 deg)