sport-touring / default rider 183 cm
Triumph Sprint ST 1050 vs Yamaha FJR1300ES ergonomics
Yamaha FJR1300ES scores 100 vs 95 for the default rider, making it the stronger ergonomic fit than Triumph Sprint ST 1050 in this comparison.
Fit verdict
Triumph Sprint ST 1050
95Comfortable
All contacts reached
Yamaha FJR1300ES
100Comfortable
All contacts reached
Yamaha FJR1300ES has the stronger default-rider fit in this generated comparison.
Rider fit: reaching the ground
The Triumph Sprint ST 1050 has a 805 mm seat; the Yamaha FJR1300ES sits at 805 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. As a rule of thumb you flat-foot a bike when your inseam roughly matches its seat height: about 81 cm for the Triumph Sprint ST 1050 and 81 cm for the Yamaha FJR1300ES.
Geometry snapshot
| Spec | Triumph Sprint ST 1050 | Yamaha FJR1300ES |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 805 mm | 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,457 mm | 1,545 mm |
| Wet weight | - | 292 kg |
| Displacement | 1,050 cc | 1,298 cc |
Posture metrics
Knee angle
- Triumph Sprint ST 1050
- Sport (57.9 deg)
- Yamaha FJR1300ES
- Neutral (79.6 deg)
Hip angle
- Triumph Sprint ST 1050
- Neutral (90.4 deg)
- Yamaha FJR1300ES
- Neutral (108.8 deg)
Elbow angle
- Triumph Sprint ST 1050
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
- Yamaha FJR1300ES
- Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Torso lean
- Triumph Sprint ST 1050
- Neutral (13.2 deg)
- Yamaha FJR1300ES
- Neutral (16.2 deg)