Skip to content
Rider Height
<- Comparison guides

enduro / default rider 183 cm

Triumph TF 250-E vs Yamaha WR250F ergonomics

Triumph TF 250-E and Yamaha WR250F have modeled posture scores within three points for the 183 cm default rider. Treat this as a planning estimate; posture preference, data confidence, and a real test sit still matter.

Modeled fit comparison

Triumph TF 250-E

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

Yamaha WR250F

Modeled scoreProvisional
95Comfortable

All contacts reached

The modeled scores are within three points, so the result does not distinguish a higher-scoring bike. Treat the result as a planning estimate and compare each bike's geometry confidence before a real test sit.

Rider fit: reaching the ground

The Triumph TF 250-E lists a 955 mm seat; the Yamaha WR250F lists 955 mm, within a few millimetres of each other. Seat height is only a first-pass ground-reach input. It does not establish safety or actual foot contact. Seat width, suspension sag, boots, mobility, load, and individual proportions can materially change the result.

Geometry snapshot

Geometry comparison for Triumph TF 250-E and Yamaha WR250F
SpecTriumph TF 250-EYamaha WR250F
Seat height955 mm955 mm
Wheelbase1,488 mm1,470 mm
Wet weight114 kg113 kg
Displacement250 cc250 cc

Posture metrics

Knee angle

Triumph TF 250-E
Sport (58.1 deg)
Yamaha WR250F
Sport (58.1 deg)

Hip angle

Triumph TF 250-E
Neutral (93.2 deg)
Yamaha WR250F
Neutral (93.6 deg)

Elbow angle

Triumph TF 250-E
Relaxed (143.3 deg)
Yamaha WR250F
Relaxed (143.3 deg)

Torso lean

Triumph TF 250-E
Neutral (12.6 deg)
Yamaha WR250F
Neutral (12.3 deg)